Tag Archives: teaching methods

Students’ Questions: More, Better, Faster?

3 Mar
Questioned Proposal

Photo by Ethan Lofton.

I have thought a lot about the nature of questions and their relationship with my teaching.

Of course, I always want students to ask questions in class. I welcome all questions, because they show engagement with the class (even if superficial), but I do certainly savor the insightful, penetrating student question that takes discussion to the next level.

On a bigger scale, I want my class to be about students’ questions so that the topics feel relevant and interesting to them. I don’t always know what students want to know or to be able to do after the end of a course. I often do surveys at the start of a semester to see what they’re thinking. And, naturally, I’ll always need to supplement their interests with other things they didn’t know they’d be interested in; they don’t know what they don’t know yet. But I want their curiosity to guide a great deal of our class.

I tried one semester to designate a question of the day for each class session on the schedule. We ended up talking about different things than my questions had originally mentioned. Again, though, that’s me imposing my questions on the class.

I really like this idea from the Teaching Professor blog by Maryellen Weimer at Faculty Focus, which combines a question from the professor with students’ own questions, generated after they have gained knowledge about the subject:

Victoria Costa writes about teaching introductory biology and chemistry courses to nonscience majors and beginning the courses with what she calls a course question: “How does chemistry (or biology, depending on the course) impact my personal life and society?” This question forms the basis of the course final, provides the framework within which students pose for themselves a “personal perplexity” or question of particular interest to them. In their final, an essay, they explain this question’s relevance to them and society, and they use course content to explore the question’s answer.

Costa’s course assignments also connect to the “course question.”

This semester, I’ve had my grad students in Qualitative Methods submit five questions about their assigned readings instead of the assignment I’ve previously used, which was a one-page response to the readings. I read over the students’ questions and use them in class. The questions highlight their areas of uncertainty, make connections among the readings, and help me get everyone participating in discussion.

I have also had my 110-student undergraduate class divided into teams this semester and last fall. Each team of five students submits a form at the beginning of class that asks for a discussion question related to the reading. I read the forms as they finish them, highlight interesting or recurring ones, and talk those over with the class before we begin the rest of the day’s activities. This has also been pretty successful.

I know many faculty bemoan students’ seeming lack of curiosity about the subjects we teach, but if we get them started by asking them to take time to examine their knowledge and think about the topic’s complexity, they often find provocative and fun issues to ask about.

I’ve struggled, though, with finding more ways to elicit and integrate students’ own interests and questions into our class — particularly in the large undergraduate class I teach, and especially “on the fly,” when questions are sparse in the middle of an activity or a lecture portion in class.

What other methods have you used to help students’ questions guide your courses and class sessions, and to keep the questions and curiosity flowing?

The Mass Comm Intro Class: What Worked, What We Learned

14 Dec

It’s the end of my first attempt to dramatically change the way I teach the introductory mass communication class at Fresno State and, as I did mid-semester, I thought I’d blog a bit about how well this new approach played out.

Students’ responses at the end of the semester to our use of popular nonfiction in lieu of a traditional textbook were generally positive. Though I’m rotating out a couple of the books we used in favor of more reader-friendly and updated titles for the spring semester, the selections I used this fall were well-received. Some commented that they enjoyed the variety of perspectives and examples in the books, which was gratifying. Personally, I also found the books much more stimulating to read and teach, and I’m looking forward to reading my three new selections over the holidays so I’m ready for the spring semester.

My holiday reading pile.

I also tried out some new strategies for managing and engaging this large class of 116 students. There are no discussion sections for the course, so it was important to me both to provide many opportunities for small-group and whole-class discussion and to help students connect with others and build support systems within the class. I set up two grouping systems: “blocks” of ~20 students, named by colors; and “teams” of 4-6 students, which were numbered. (The whole syllabus is here.) Though it took a while to get everyone used to the nomenclature, I think it was really helpful to have the students immediately grouped into networks with others. After 4-5 quick iClicker reading review questions, every class session also began with a 10-minute team discussion period, during which students completed a response form that I collected and immediately used in an initial question-and-answer period to launch the day’s discussion.

Interestingly, in studying my grade breakdown for the semester, it looks like two trends occurred. (I didn’t get too quantitative on this, so these are just impressions.) First, the teams that bonded – who I could see really interacting well in class – seem to have obtained higher grades individually. Of course, this has to partly be due to their better cooperation for the few group assignments, but I would like to think it’s at least partly because they could rely upon each other for help and clarification of course material and requirements.

Second, I also think that I probably had a much lower rate of attrition this semester than I did last semester, notable especially in a fall semester when many first-semester new students in this general education course may vanish. I appear to have fewer Fs due to student disappearances (and fewer Fs overall) this semester. Again, I’d like to think that’s because the teams held each other accountable to some degree – and simply were just there every day as familiar faces for students who might otherwise become lost and disconnected in a big class. I’m sure there were other factors – maybe they liked nonfiction better? maybe some of the new assignments were also easier? – but perhaps there’s something more behind that difference in failures.

Finally, I’d like to share the students’ responses to the final exam’s extra credit question, which asked them to identify a concept or topic from the class that they thought they’d remember five years from now and explain why. Here’s a breakdown of the 84 responses (why 32 students didn’t do the extra credit, I’ll never understand!):

  • Selective media exposure/biased assimilation/filtering: 12 (True Enough brought this home)
  • Media literacy and its overall importance: 11
  • The realities of celebrity/rethinking our connections to celebrity: 11 (the students loved Fame Junkies!)
  • Analyzing ads/awareness of advertising and marketing strategies: 9
  • The role of PR and video news releases in journalism: 5 (we watched some of Toxic Sludge is Good for You)
  • Media fragmentation/niche audiences: 4
  • Power of media to define/shape reality: 4
  • Mean world syndrome and cultivation theory: 3
  • Growth of technology and communication methods/devices: 3
  • Decline of print media: 3
  • Narcissism of youth and possible media role in encouraging: 2 (from Fame Junkies again, and we did this in class)
  • How Wikipedia works: 2
  • Growth and power of social media: 2
  • Social media and “slacktivism“: 2
  • Third person effect: 2
  • Lack of world news coverage in the U.S./closure of foreign news bureaus: 2 (this made an impact)
  • Photo manipulation and ethics: 2 (both were female students)
  • Media consolidation/role of conglomerates: 1
  • Importance of failure in media industries and in life: 1 (Clay Shirky’s discussion of “failure is free” in Here Comes Everybody)
  • How we make choices: 1 (we watched Sheena Iyengar’s TED talk on this)
  • TED talks are cool: 1 (we did use a few others in class too!)
  • Role of media regulation: 1
  • Young people don’t know about the world, news, etc.: 1
  • Comedians can be informative: 1 (we used a lot of Jon Stewart/Stephen Colbert clips too)

Looking at this list now, I’m pretty pleased with it. Unfortunately, some of the structural media issues didn’t quite stick with the students (or weren’t as appealing to use for the question). Still, I am surprised by how many remained interested in and concerned about their own selective tendencies with regard to their media exposure, and about how those preferences would shape their lives, politics, and so on. If I’ve managed to make them more aware of their choices and their effects, then I’m content. And, just as I see my students begin to question and analyze their own choices, so too should I continue to do the same – and that’s how we all learn from each other.

I may write more about this class and my plans for next time around when I have time and a bit more distance from the semester. In the meantime, thanks, MCJ 1, for a great semester!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,133 other followers